Search · 1.1× above normal
Forums · 1.6× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore, die Bewertung liegt aber deutlich über der eigenen Historie.
We count daily how often a stock shows up in US forums like Reddit and how often it's searched on Google afterwards, and compare that to its own average. Only real outliers land here, no background noise. Alongside it sits a substance check from our own scores, so you can see whether the attention is justified.
Basis: aggregated discussion metrics from US retail forums + Google Search Trends, as of 16/10/2026.
The small trend lines (sparklines) compare the first and last value of the last up to 30 days: green means attention rose over that period, red means it fell. Not a signal for price direction.
Search · 1.1× above normal
Forums · 1.6× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore, die Bewertung liegt aber deutlich über der eigenen Historie.
Search · 1.1× above normal
Forums · 1.6× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.5× above normal
Forums · 2.2× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.1× above normal
Forums · 3.1× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.6× above normal
Forums
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.1× above normal
Forums · 1.8× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore und einer Bewertung im Rahmen der eigenen Historie.
Search · 1.3× above normal
Forums · 2.4× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.2× above normal
Forums
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore und einer Bewertung im Rahmen der eigenen Historie.
Search · 1.2× above normal
Forums
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore und einer Bewertung im Rahmen der eigenen Historie.
Search · 1.3× above normal
Forums · 2.9× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.0× above normal
Forums
Viel Aufmerksamkeit bei hohem Qualitätsscore und einer Bewertung im Rahmen der eigenen Historie.
Search · 1.0× above normal
Forums · 1.1× above normal
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Search · 1.0× above normal
Forums
Viel Aufmerksamkeit, aber unsere Zahlen dazu sind nicht eindeutig: weder klar gut noch klar schlecht bewertet.
Register for free
+5 more titles
Basics
Four points on which data goes in, what we compare it against, and what a high value means, and what it doesn't.
We count daily how often a stock is mentioned in US retail forums like Reddit and how often it's searched for on Google. Both are attention measures, not trading data: they say what's being talked about, not how much was bought or sold.
A large stock always gets mentioned more often than a small one. That's why what counts isn't the absolute number but the distance from the stock's own average over recent weeks. Only real outliers make this list, not the regulars of every headline.
Forums and search can spike together or separately. If only the forum spikes, it's usually a trader phenomenon. If only search spikes, there's often a news story behind it that reached a wider audience. Which pattern applies is shown next to each stock.
A stock everyone suddenly talks about tends to swing harder than before. That's information about risk, not a statement about valuation or quality, and certainly not a recommendation. For the numbers, every row links to the stock page with ratios and scores.
FAQ
Where the data comes from and what a high value tells you.
The list on this page shows the stocks whose attention sits furthest above their own normal value, sorted by that distance. It's recalculated daily, and the date is shown above the list.
From two sources: aggregated mentions in US retail forums and Google search trends. Both are collected daily and compared per stock against its own average over recent weeks, not against the market.
No. Attention says nothing about direction. What it reliably signals is elevated volatility risk: stocks with a sudden rush of attention move harder in both directions. Market Jury gives no buy or sell recommendations.
These sparklines compare the first with the last value of the past up to 30 days. Green means attention rose over that period, red means it fell.
No. We measure conversations and searches, not trading volume. A stock can run through forums for days without its volume changing noticeably, and conversely large volumes often move completely unnoticed.
Daily. The raw data comes in overnight, after which the distances to each average are recalculated. The date above the list shows which day the current numbers are from.
You can see the nightly scan without an account. With a free account you see all scores and lists in full and ask the agents yourself, with five credits on the house.
Not investment advice, not a recommendation, not a forecast. The portfolios are virtual, every decision is timestamped and verifiable.